<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will IE8 InPrivate Browsing Hurt Affiliate Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/</link>
	<description>Geno talks about affiliate marketing, leadership, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=308#comment-216</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rett&lt;/strong&gt;,

There is a high probability that you have posted the above (question?) only to link to your Squidoo page, but giving you the benefit of the doubt, I&#039;ll reply.

Since InPrivate Browsing allows one to surf the web anonymously (without leaving entries in the browser history, or setting long-term cookies), the fear has been that of the InPrivateBrowsing having a negative effect on affiliate program tracking. Affiliates they get paid a % of (or a $ for) each order they refer to the advertiser/merchant, and most of the present-day tracking systems use &lt;i&gt;cookies&lt;/i&gt; set on the end user&#039;s machine to track the whole process from the moment of click on the affiliate link to the moment of the actual sale on the advertiser&#039;s/merchant&#039;s website. The rest is summarized in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rett</strong>,</p>
<p>There is a high probability that you have posted the above (question?) only to link to your Squidoo page, but giving you the benefit of the doubt, I&#8217;ll reply.</p>
<p>Since InPrivate Browsing allows one to surf the web anonymously (without leaving entries in the browser history, or setting long-term cookies), the fear has been that of the InPrivateBrowsing having a negative effect on affiliate program tracking. Affiliates they get paid a % of (or a $ for) each order they refer to the advertiser/merchant, and most of the present-day tracking systems use <i>cookies</i> set on the end user&#8217;s machine to track the whole process from the moment of click on the affiliate link to the moment of the actual sale on the advertiser&#8217;s/merchant&#8217;s website. The rest is summarized in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rett Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Rett Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=308#comment-214</guid>
		<description>What entice you to post an article. This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What entice you to post an article. This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=308#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Richard (both for your kind words, but especially for the conversation we&#039;ve had on the subject).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Richard (both for your kind words, but especially for the conversation we&#8217;ve had on the subject).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gaskin</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/01/27/will-ie8-inprivate-browsing-hurt-affiliate-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gaskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=308#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Good job, Geno.  This has been a big concern in many circles, and once again you&#039;ve done a great job in sifting through the wash of information to distill a useful summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, Geno.  This has been a big concern in many circles, and once again you&#8217;ve done a great job in sifting through the wash of information to distill a useful summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

