<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heads Up, California Affiliates: Online Sales Tax Proposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/</link>
	<description>Geno talks about affiliate marketing, leadership, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=737#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>There is already the Streamlined Sale Tax Project.

See http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/

Which has been implemented by a number of states and appears to be gaining traction as the national solution to this issue.  

The SST will not make it easier on any retailer since taxes are collected based on the delivery location.  This will require every retailer to have knowledge of the tax rates and tax exemptions of all jurisdictions in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already the Streamlined Sale Tax Project.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/</a></p>
<p>Which has been implemented by a number of states and appears to be gaining traction as the national solution to this issue.  </p>
<p>The SST will not make it easier on any retailer since taxes are collected based on the delivery location.  This will require every retailer to have knowledge of the tax rates and tax exemptions of all jurisdictions in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=737#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Melanie of NYAffiliateVoice.com has just posted that the California State Committee on Revenue and Tax has set a hearing date for the California Bill 178, and it is April 13, 2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://nyaffiliatevoice.com/2009/03/california-bill-178-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie of NYAffiliateVoice.com has just posted that the California State Committee on Revenue and Tax has set a hearing date for the California Bill 178, and it is April 13, 2009. <a href="http://nyaffiliatevoice.com/2009/03/california-bill-178-update/" rel="nofollow">More here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=737#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Two good posts were made today: a blog post, and a thread on the above-quoted topic. Here are the links:

* &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jangro.com/a/2009/03/01/assembly-bill-178-an-open-letter-to-california-legislators/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Assembly Bill 178: An Open Letter to California Legislators&lt;/a&gt;
* &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=116770&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Which Merchants Will Exclude CA Affiliates? (AB 178)&lt;/a&gt;

I would encourage my readers to follow both of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two good posts were made today: a blog post, and a thread on the above-quoted topic. Here are the links:</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.jangro.com/a/2009/03/01/assembly-bill-178-an-open-letter-to-california-legislators/" rel="nofollow">Assembly Bill 178: An Open Letter to California Legislators</a><br />
* <a href="http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=116770" rel="nofollow">Which Merchants Will Exclude CA Affiliates? (AB 178)</a></p>
<p>I would encourage my readers to follow both of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=737#comment-614</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Melanie&lt;/b&gt;,

Thank you for your comment, and for starting the movement. I can&#039;t help but recall Kotter&#039;s 8-Step Change Model, where the very first step is exactly what you&#039;re doing now - &quot;creating a sense of urgency.&quot; Keep up the good work, Mellie!

Yes, it does look like the passage is likely. And I have also heard of other states contemplating the same law (a fellow-affiliate manager told me about IL).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Melanie</b>,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment, and for starting the movement. I can&#8217;t help but recall Kotter&#8217;s 8-Step Change Model, where the very first step is exactly what you&#8217;re doing now &#8211; &#8220;creating a sense of urgency.&#8221; Keep up the good work, Mellie!</p>
<p>Yes, it does look like the passage is likely. And I have also heard of other states contemplating the same law (a fellow-affiliate manager told me about IL).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Seery</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/02/26/heads-up-california-affiliates-online-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Seery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=737#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Thanks Geno. This California Bill is just the beginning, many other states will follow.

It is going to become very complicated to deal with all the different tax rates. A streamlined tax would be the best alternative but that will take Federal action.

Hopefully the NY situation has prepared us for California but it will still be a mess if it passes. Passage is likely because of NY court ruling and the download taxes passed in other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Geno. This California Bill is just the beginning, many other states will follow.</p>
<p>It is going to become very complicated to deal with all the different tax rates. A streamlined tax would be the best alternative but that will take Federal action.</p>
<p>Hopefully the NY situation has prepared us for California but it will still be a mess if it passes. Passage is likely because of NY court ruling and the download taxes passed in other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

