<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon.com Fails to Adjust Affiliate Program for New Technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/</link>
	<description>Geno talks about affiliate marketing, leadership, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>Interesting. If you do experiment again, let me know how it turns out. Best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. If you do experiment again, let me know how it turns out. Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ely</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>I am not sending it anymore. Last time I seriously considered them was a few years ago. Yes, it was good targeted traffic, I even asked a friend to test with the negative result. Maybe I should try again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sending it anymore. Last time I seriously considered them was a few years ago. Yes, it was good targeted traffic, I even asked a friend to test with the negative result. Maybe I should try again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>I cannot say first hand, as I not an Amazon&#039;s affiliate, but I am hearing that Amazon converts well for those that promote it. Really surprised to hear what you&#039;re saying.

So, you&#039;re saying you were sending them good &lt;i&gt;targeted&lt;/i&gt; (?) traffic, and it didn&#039;t convert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot say first hand, as I not an Amazon&#8217;s affiliate, but I am hearing that Amazon converts well for those that promote it. Really surprised to hear what you&#8217;re saying.</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;re saying you were sending them good <i>targeted</i> (?) traffic, and it didn&#8217;t convert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ely</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>I noticed significant hangups Amazon has about referal websites. In fact, for all practical purposes I gave up on Amazon affiliate program and only use it to legitimately show covers of the books I truly recommend. I&#039;ve put a lot of links for years under a good traffic (starting 1999, I belive) and never seen real commissions since very old times. It almost feels like they would only credit referrals from the site originally registered with their program. 

I don&#039;t know, maybe I am doing something wrong, but for me they are just one more deadbeat affiliate programs that never pays and not worth attention. I even asked Shawn Collins on his blog, and he claims it works for him. Good to hear, but not for me.

Interesting idea though to check their &quot;agreement&quot;. I guess, I&#039;ll do so when I have a time between better money making activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed significant hangups Amazon has about referal websites. In fact, for all practical purposes I gave up on Amazon affiliate program and only use it to legitimately show covers of the books I truly recommend. I&#8217;ve put a lot of links for years under a good traffic (starting 1999, I belive) and never seen real commissions since very old times. It almost feels like they would only credit referrals from the site originally registered with their program. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, maybe I am doing something wrong, but for me they are just one more deadbeat affiliate programs that never pays and not worth attention. I even asked Shawn Collins on his blog, and he claims it works for him. Good to hear, but not for me.</p>
<p>Interesting idea though to check their &#8220;agreement&#8221;. I guess, I&#8217;ll do so when I have a time between better money making activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geno</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>Good for you, &lt;b&gt;Travis&lt;/b&gt; 

Do you require the affiliate to mark their link as an affiliate one when pushed through Twitter, Facebook, or other social media channels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you, <b>Travis</b> </p>
<p>Do you require the affiliate to mark their link as an affiliate one when pushed through Twitter, Facebook, or other social media channels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis - Overstock.com</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis - Overstock.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>We being Overstock.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We being Overstock.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2009/07/08/amazoncom-fails-to-adjust-affiliate-program-for-new-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=2201#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>We allow deals posted on Twitter.  It needs to land on the Publishers page first similar to our Paid Search T&#039;s and C&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We allow deals posted on Twitter.  It needs to land on the Publishers page first similar to our Paid Search T&#8217;s and C&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
