<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Attack: Data of 100 Million Users Collected &amp; Published</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2010/07/29/facebook-attack-data-of-100-million-users-collected-published/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2010/07/29/facebook-attack-data-of-100-million-users-collected-published/</link>
	<description>Geno talks about affiliate marketing, leadership, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jed@Affiliate tools</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2010/07/29/facebook-attack-data-of-100-million-users-collected-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed@Affiliate tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=8921#comment-7424</guid>
		<description>@ Robbohk......

I agree completely.  If users are not smart enough to manage what is being shared and what is not on a social site, then they should not be using that program.  It is easy to sit and point fingers but the bottom line is it is YOUR information.  Manage it or do not put it out there.  Social media has an inherent risk that people will try and grab your data.  I guess you inherently accept that risk when you participate.  Whether it be blogs, facebook, twitter, linkedin, etc.  You are putting information out there about yourself into cyberspace.
Now if facebook was not providing the ability for you to limit who could and could not see your information then this becomes an entirely different argument.  Or if they had breached those security settings and accessed &quot;friends only&quot; information, not being a friend.  Also a different argument.

Be responsible for your actions and information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Robbohk&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree completely.  If users are not smart enough to manage what is being shared and what is not on a social site, then they should not be using that program.  It is easy to sit and point fingers but the bottom line is it is YOUR information.  Manage it or do not put it out there.  Social media has an inherent risk that people will try and grab your data.  I guess you inherently accept that risk when you participate.  Whether it be blogs, facebook, twitter, linkedin, etc.  You are putting information out there about yourself into cyberspace.<br />
Now if facebook was not providing the ability for you to limit who could and could not see your information then this becomes an entirely different argument.  Or if they had breached those security settings and accessed &#8220;friends only&#8221; information, not being a friend.  Also a different argument.</p>
<p>Be responsible for your actions and information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbohk</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2010/07/29/facebook-attack-data-of-100-million-users-collected-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7420</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbohk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=8921#comment-7420</guid>
		<description>@Andy....

Why is this disgracefull?? This information is in the public domain because people have left it out their in the public domain. No other reason. Facebook should NEVER be in a position to pick and choose what information WE can and cannot share. It is up to the users themselves to do that. 

The purpose of social networking is to maintain communication channels between friends either past or present. People choose to put their information into the public domain so they can easily be found. Making a fuss over this is utter nonsense.

If anyone is upset at being found on this list it is no ones fault but their own. I had a look at my own privacy settings this morning and comments that it is difficult or complex to check are an utter joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy&#8230;.</p>
<p>Why is this disgracefull?? This information is in the public domain because people have left it out their in the public domain. No other reason. Facebook should NEVER be in a position to pick and choose what information WE can and cannot share. It is up to the users themselves to do that. </p>
<p>The purpose of social networking is to maintain communication channels between friends either past or present. People choose to put their information into the public domain so they can easily be found. Making a fuss over this is utter nonsense.</p>
<p>If anyone is upset at being found on this list it is no ones fault but their own. I had a look at my own privacy settings this morning and comments that it is difficult or complex to check are an utter joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy @ FirstFound</title>
		<link>http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/2010/07/29/facebook-attack-data-of-100-million-users-collected-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7419</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy @ FirstFound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amnavigator.com/blog/?p=8921#comment-7419</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s amazingly disgraceful. Regardless of individual user settings, Facebook needs to secure their own systems pronto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s amazingly disgraceful. Regardless of individual user settings, Facebook needs to secure their own systems pronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

