I wanted to provide this information for a total of eight affiliate networks, but two have never responded. I have included their names in the table, and will add their information if/when it becomes available. I compared the more traditional networks, and have not included any of the sub-affiliate ones here (read about the differences in this blog post of mine).

Here’s my brief side-by-side comparison of how much a merchant should expect to spend on launching an affiliate program on the top North American affiliate networks, and how much they should be prepared to spend to maintain the program:

Network’s Name
Setup Fee
Deposit
Transaction Fee
Other
Affiliate Future
$1,000
$0
30% of commission
$100/mo access fee
AvantLink
$1,000
$500
3% of sale’s total
buy.at no data
CommissionJunction
$500 – $20,000/mo
30% of commission
Google Affiliate Network
$1,000
varies ($1000-5000)
25% of commission
LinkShare
$5,000-10,000
varies
2-3% of sale’s total
Pepperjam no data
ShareResults
$500
$500
25% of commission
ShareASale
$500
$100
20% of commission
$25 monthly minimum

With some of the above-listed networks the setup fee includes such things as assistance with tracking integration, technical and automatic configuration of daily datafeed updates (AvantLink is known for that), additional exposure for newly-launched programs, and account management interface training.

The above list follows an alphabetical order, and is not meant to rank, but only compare whatever affiliate network information I was able to obtain. Experience shows that it is not unusual for the pricing to change; so, it is always best to check for the most up-to-date information with the affiliate network directly. The above comparison should give you a good preliminary idea of what to expect to pay.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Compare North American Affiliate Networks Side-by-Side”

  1. Sandis says:

    Nice list! However, to make this list complete it would be good to see approximate costs of having a dedicated affiliate management included.

  2. Geno says:

    Sandis,

    I don’t want to go into the affiliate program management costs (remember, you cannot manage affiliates!). Some of the networks don’t do it, while others would provide such information to their existing clients only. So, I’ll just keep the number of columns limited to the ones that I have above.

  3. Raphael says:

    Thanks Geno, what about clixGalore ?!

  4. Geno says:

    Raphel,

    Thank you for your question. I decided to stay away from “CPA networks” (see the first paragraph), and stick with the traditional ones only.

  5. David says:

    Geno,

    Thank you. I am helping a merchant start an affiliate program. We are looking for a network and this information helps. The 50% difference in the set-up and long-term transaction fees is much larger than we expected. I doubt this large disparity exists between the competing merchants in these networks – so why here?

    I do not want to discount the value from some of the merchants but can you help me understand what value justifies an additional 25% and 50% transaction fee.

    I initially thought it might be because affiliates only work with one network but I learned that affiliates belong to multiple networks and shop for the best merchants.

    So do all networks provide equal access to all affiliates – to all super affiliates?

    Thank You Again,

    David

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

« Back to text comment